Live broadcast, September 11 news media person Zhao Huanyu published an article “will naturalized players destroy Chinese basketball” on the personal public number “national basketball as self-improvement” today. The issues about naturalized players and Chinese basketball were discussed. The original text is as follows: Will naturalized players destroy Chinese basketball? First conclusion: of course not. In addition, if a naturalized player can destroy Chinese basketball, it is meaningless for such Chinese basketball not to do it. If it is destroyed early and overborn, it will be happy. People who hold the view of “destroying” believe that naturalized players will occupy the development space of local players, which will eventually lead to the partial collapse of China’s basketball talent training system from top to bottom. These friends obviously don’t understand the running logic of Chinese basketball. There is neither a vacuum nor a huge stone between the national team and the grassroots. It is full of various motives and appeals, which are just these motives and appeals, which constitute the fundamental driving force for the emergence of Chinese basketball talents. You see, the training of Chinese basketball talents is basically in the state of walking on two legs at present. One school and one professional team will see if Chinese basketball will be destroyed, it depends on whether these two legs will lose their ability because of the domestication of a player. Let’s talk about school first. The motivation of most student athletes to play is not to enter the national team or even CBA, but to go to a better university by playing basketball. As long as the baton of entering the school is still there, as long as the sports association is not boisterous, the continuous and vigorous development of campus basketball is a foregone conclusion. Therefore, the leg of campus basketball can be guaranteed. Besides, professional team. The motives in this area can be subdivided into two categories: the motives of sports bureau and the motives of enterprises. These two motives are sometimes distinct and sometimes intertwined. They point to two competitions, the four-year National Games and the annual CBA league. As long as these two baton are still there, the sports bureau and enterprises will spare no effort to cultivate talents, even if this training is periodic, sometimes it is even intermittent. So you can see that all the main bodies of naturalized players and Chinese basketball talents training are completely water and water. The statement that “naturalized players hurt the enthusiasm of local players and coaches” is not valid at all. First, the national team is not a place to train talents for local teams. It may objectively have such an effect, but in the final analysis, it is only a by-product of the existence of the national team and the fundamental purpose of the existence of the national team, it is to compete for honor in the international arena so as to unite people and build a sense of community. Many people said, “I will not watch foreigners in the national team.” Let’s see if the national team will be happy when they return to the Olympics through domestication. Second, the arrival of naturalized players does slightly occupy the rising channel of local players. There are only 12 people on the big list. Naturalized players occupy an opportunity, which means that a marginal person on the 12-person list loses an opportunity. Can this local player who lost the opportunity be depressed and depressed from then on? If not, what is the worry? If so, it means that he could not have become a climate. Should he place his hope for the revival of the National basket on such a person? I want to go, but I can’t turn the corner of “naturalized players destroy Chinese basketball. There are many ways to destroy Chinese basketball, and naturalized players are by no means one of them. This heroic historical view of “one person destroys a career” is unnecessary. We can even say that in many assumptions of saving the national basketball team, naturalized players are the methods that involve the narrowest, lowest cost and least damage to muscles and bones. Giving money and leading people, that’s all, it is simpler than all kinds of basketball junior plans to stay in the United States. Many people say that the experience of the national football team has proved that domestication is a blind lamp-wasted wax. I don’t understand football, but I also know that the weakness of the national football team is far more than that of the national basketball team, and due to the rules, it is difficult to be naturalized to be a player in the year of playing. Therefore, you can’t fight against domestication and the failure experience of moving the national football. Our more scientific reference system should be basketball. Look at the Asian powers, and then look at the European countries, without exception, they all tasted the sweetness. Many people said again: can it be the same to send players out to study, just like directly letting foreigners play games on behalf of China? One is to treat infertility, and the other is to find a surrogate mother. These people are wrong, naturalized, ethical and regular, while surrogacy, rebellious human relations and violation of the law cannot be directly compared with each other. When it comes to this, they who have no attachment to logic and rules are estimated to speak big words such as lineage, dignity and culture. I am not very familiar with history, so I find out what I know. Known as “the first person to learn from China and the West”, the Jesuit Matteo Ricci and his descendants Johann Adam Schall von Bell helped the Chinese revise the calendar, that is, the “time constitution calendar”. The great event of the country is in sacrifice and Rong. What is the calendar? It is directly related to sacrifice and farming. According to the attitude of some people on the issue of domestication of players, does the country face blond foreigners with a beak? But the ancients hundreds of years ago had such openness and tolerance. Why is today’s people hundreds of years later inferior to the ancients? “They just live and live in China. Can that be the same as the national team?” Naturalized opponents continue to argue. Alas, believe me, the honor of staying and working in the Ming Empire, where the sea was heavily banned, was definitely far beyond domestication. After Matteo Ricci’s death, Emperor Wanli of the Ming God also gave him a cemetery, so far, he can still sleep in the hospital of Beijing Institute of Administration, which is what naturalized players can compare. To put it bluntly, the arguments and arguments of naturalized opponents are not very tenable, while the benefits of naturalized players are obvious, which can be regarded as beneficial and harmless. Today, I saw a divine comment: domestication is a highway built by FIBA. Others are driving on the highway. You have to drive a broken car and go to the National Highway to chase the highway. What can’t you think? (Stan) Use naturalized players? Do you support or oppose it
